Other Blogs
The Naked Truth in a Confused World: http://thenakedtruthinaconfusedworld.blogspot.ca/
Stories; very short, short and long: http://greyliteratureandlinguistics.blogspot.ca/
Showing posts with label Sisi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sisi. Show all posts
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Monday, November 2, 2015
EGYPT: The Egyptian president, El-Sisi gives his nation the lazy eye.
From Muhammad Nassir to El-Sisi
After a harsh speech addressed to the nation by El-Sisi
Satire
Satire
Good evening, Sisi! I hope you are fine!
My cousins have a message for you.
They are a group of idle young guys.
A half of them is starving.
The other half is scavenging garbage pins.
My friends at the café would kiss your hand.
In fact, they damn the circumstance that brought you
to power
A group of revolutionary guysm, they are.
Some belong to 6-April, some are liberal.
Others are Ikhwan recuperating in prisons.
Damn be he who upsets you!
By God, do not be upset.
You look like you have lost weight.
Your suite has become loose and your face looks pale.
Your teeth are shaking as if your heart is aware that
something will happen.
Do not worry, it is the cursed nation.
A nation that does not know what is good for her.
A nation that is ungrateful.
A nation that deserves a low-life president.
You are far from being a low-life.
How cute you are though the nation is starving!
I am here just to tell you a few words to make you
happy
Words that are like a sickle…cutting through my skin.
When you said, “Have you elected me to torture me?
I am going to complain to the nation.”
Man, complain to who about who?
You were so nervous because you did not like those
who are talked about you,
though they were the pupil of your eye.
They have sold out all their principles to support
you.
Have they been a bit harsh in their citicism?
May they suffer!
But those were your men.
How many times they applauded for you!
Be careful! Do not let yourself be exposed!
Anyways, do you remember when they ousted Morsi?
Have you forgotten?
What a cruel heart you have.
A bunch of media people upsetting you!
Were you not the lion?
Need you a spell against envy?
Are you forgetting?
Is not Egypt your father’s real estate.
And the nation is but your slaves.
Flog them!
Use your club!
Oh, you look so tired.
Allow me to say a truthful word.
You are right,
There are bad people who want to torture you with
their criticism
They blame you for what?
Are you not the brave General?
Do not cry and hush them up with issuance of a presidential
decree.
And say to the nation,
“My beloved people who are the light of my eyes,
I have decided to gather your opinions of me in a
survey”
The millions may show up singing,
“Come back, our president”
Did not Amr Adeeb ask you to be more abusive so that
we wake up and understand?
They say you have sold us an illusion.
So What!
It is not your fault.
The faulty one is he who agreed to buy.
They needed a good dream.
Do the survey.
What nation!
They have no interest in silk but in a cheap fabric.
Have not some purchased apartments in your
illusionary one-million-apartment project
And others are now possessing million acres of land?
A nation you made mount a rocket,
And brought to them your illusionary medical shish-kebab
project.
Between you and me, let me tell you,
you do not look well.
You look worried like someone who has been exposed
for his lies.
If you need to rest for a while, then do it.
And let me tell your people,
“El-Sisi is right. He said that he was of you, that
you asked him to be careful.”
He is careful.
Do the survey and show those who are plotting against
you how beloved you are.
You were right when you once said that this nation
did not have someone to take care for it.
Get closer, then, to your people!
Remember Tamarrud when they stood against Morsi and
said,
“We do not want you because the streets are not yet
secure,
Poor people still poor, we still beg for funds from
foreign countries,
We and the country have lost our dignity,
The economy has collapsed and is now relying on
begging,
You have become an American agent,
By God, tell me, is not this what it is right now?
You know what; you have already split the family
Go home, if the burden is too heavy for you to carry
Or be a man and do the survey!
Labels:
Corruption,
Egypt,
Egyptians,
Military Rule,
Poverty,
Sisi,
Tyranny
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
EGYPT: Did Animal Farm is an allegorical and dystopian novella by George Orwell predict the current Egyptian situation?
Animal Farm
Animal Farm is an allegorical and dystopian novella by George Orwell, first published in England on 17 August 1945.
According to Orwell, the book reflects events leading up to the Russian Revolution of 1917 and then on into the Stalin era in the Soviet Union. Orwell, a democratic socialist, was a critic of Joseph Stalin and hostile to Moscow-directed Stalinism, an attitude that was critically shaped by his experiences during the Spanish Civil War. The Soviet Union, he believed, had become a brutal dictatorship, built upon a cult of personality and enforced by a reign of terror. In a letter to Yvonne Davet, Orwell described Animal Farm as a satirical tale against Stalin ("un conte satirique contre Staline"), and in his essay "Why I Write" (1946), he wrote that Animal Farm
was the first book in which he tried, with full consciousness of what
he was doing, "to fuse political purpose and artistic purpose into one
whole".
The animals of the Manor Farm live in a bad situation because their farmer Mr. Jones, a mean and always drunk man, exploits them. One day Old Major,
an old pig, called a meeting of all the animals and told them about a
dream that he had had the previous night. He had dreamed about an old
song 'Beasts of England'
that started a resistance against the human beings. Everyone was very
excited. But Old Major died a few days later and two young pigs,
Snowball and Napoleon, started leading the preparations for the Rebellion.
About three months later they revolted against Mr. Jones and they took
over the farm. The purpose of the revolution was to create a fair
society made only by animals and based on seven commandments
like “Four legs good, two legs bad” and most important one: "All
animals are equal". They also changed the name of the farm to "Animal
Farm". Snowball, an inventive and vivacious pig and Napoleon, a big and
cruel-looking pig, started to fight for leadership. In the meantime Mr.
Jones wanted to get the farm back but the animals succeeded in the
battle and Mr. Jones was forced to run away.
One day, when Snowball
announced his plans to build a windmill,
Napoleon arrived in the farm with nine big and cruel dogs that made
Snowball run away bleeding. From that day Napoleon was the real dictator
of the farm; if an animal didn't agree with him, he was eaten up by his
dogs. If something went wrong (like when the windmill they'd worked so
hard on was wrecked), Napoleon blamed it on Snowball, who, according to
him, was sneaking around Animal Farm ruining everything. When Boxer, the
strongest horse in the farm, lost his strength because of old age and
fell while he was building a windmill, Napoleon sent him to be
slaughtered. Now Napoleon had pity on nobody. He and the pigs were like
Mr. Jones - they exploited the other animals, they took advantage of the
foolishness of some animals and they came into contact with human
beings for business although they had said it was forbidden. In the end
they became like human beings, they started to walk on their hind legs
and they changed the old maxim with a new one: “Four legs good, two legs
better”. Nothing was changed and their resistance seemed to be useless.
Egyptian
Junta including El-Sisi
EGYPT: Eksisi's Egypt...
The Egyptian president, El-Sisi...may he rot in hell!
An Egyptian found unconcious and people brought him to the hospital where he was thrown on the floor for 8-9 hours like a dog unattended until he died.
For non-Arabic speakers, pleas advance video to 2:25 to see the man on the floor.
Egyptians,
this is what you're in Sisi's eyes!
Saturday, October 24, 2015
EGYPT: The Nahla (bee) dance and El-Sisi
Thursday, October 22, 2015
EGYPT: Egypt, Egypt, Egypt...
Low
turnout as Egyptians shun elections designed to shore up Sisi
In
absence of opposition parties, experts say the result is a foregone conclusion
but a low turnout suggests that the strongman president is losing popularity.
Egyptian
voters appear to have shunned the first phase of a parliamentary election that
president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi had hailed as a milestone on the road to
democracy but which his critics have called a sham.
Polling
stations visited by Reuters correspondents on Sunday pointed to a turnout of
around 10%, in sharp contrast to the long lines that formed in the 2012
election. A low turnout suggests that Sisi, who has enjoyed cult-like
adulation, is losing popularity.
“It’s
not going to matter. It’s just for show, to show that we are a democracy, and
we have elections,” said Ahmed Mostafa, 25, who works in a lab.
The
vote for the 596-member parliament will be held in two phases ending on 2
December, with Egyptians abroad casting their votes for the first round from
Saturday.
But
with an absence of opposition parties – such as the now-banned Muslim
Brotherhood, which has faced a deadly government crackdown overseen by Sisi –
the poll has not inspired the enthusiasm witnessed for Egypt’s first
democratic elections in 2011.
Experts
say the outcome of the election is a foregone conclusion and only voter turnout
will be a gauge of popularity for Sisi, who has enjoyed cult-like status since
he ousted
his predecessor Mohamed Morsi in 2013.
Most
of the more than 5,000 candidates in the polls support Sisi and are expected to
dominate parliament.
Hazem
Hosny, political science professor at Cairo University
said: “This parliament will be a parliament of the president. It’s really a
parliament … to keep things as they are, to give an image of democracy.”
Many
Egyptians, tired of political turmoil since veteran leader Hosni Mubarak was
ousted in 2011, support Sisi, who has vowed to revive an ailing economy and
restore stability.
Morsi, Egypt’s first freely elected civilian leader, was ousted
by then army chief Sisi on 3 July 2013, after mass street protests against his
divisive year-long rule.
The
ensuing government crackdown overseen by Sisi targeting Morsi’s Muslim
Brotherhood movement left hundreds dead and thousands jailed.
Hundreds
more, including Morsi, have been sentenced to death after speedy trials, which
the UN denounced as “unprecedented in recent history”.
Sisi,
meanwhile, won a presidential election in 2014.
Scores
of policemen and soldiers have been killed in jihadi attacks since the
crackdown on Islamists began, with the Egyptian affiliate of the Islamic State
group leading a deadly insurgency in North Sinai.
Sisi
enjoys support from western countries who have signed major arms deals with Cairo to back him in the
fight against jihadists.
“Sisi
is our soul … without him we would have been migrants like those from other
countries around us,” said Buthaina Shehata after she cast her vote at a Cairo polling booth.
The
constitution empowers parliament to move a no-confidence motion against the
president and gives lawmakers 15 days to review all presidential decrees.
But
experts say the ability of lawmakers might be close to zero given the absence
of any real opposition.
The
Brotherhood dominated the last assembly but is now banned after being
blacklisted as a “terrorist organisation,” while leftist and secular movements
that led the 2011 uprising are boycotting the election or lacking
representation in the polls.
It
had been the main opposition force for decades, fielding candidates in
parliamentary elections under Mubarak despite an official ban.
Its
party took 44% of seats in the first free democratic elections following
Mubarak downfall in 2011.
That
parliament was dissolved in June 2012, but the Brotherhood’s popularity shone
through days later when Morsi, a civilian, was elected, putting an end to six
decades of presidents coming from military ranks.
As
Egyptians abroad started casting their ballots on Saturday, Sisi appeared on
television calling on citizens to vote.
“Celebrate
the choice of representatives and make the right choice,” he said.
“I
am expecting Egyptian youth to be the driving force in this celebration of
democracy.”
Of
the 596 lawmakers being elected, 448 will be voted in as independents, 120 on
party lists, and 28 will be presidential appointees.
The
main coalition is the pro-Sisi For the Love of Egypt, which includes leading
businessmen and former members of Mubarak’s National Democratic party. It aims
to win two-thirds of the seats.
The
openly pro-Sisi Salafist Al-Nur party, which backed the ousting of Morsi , is
the only Islamist party standing.
About
55 million voters are eligible to cast their votes in the two-stage election
across the country’s 27 provinces, with polling in the first stage to be held
over two days.
Any
run-off in the first phase will be contested on 27-28 October. The second phase
starts on 21 November.
'The
Egyptian government is waging a war on civil society'
With
the revolution an ever more distant memory, Egyptian rulers are clamping down
hard on NGOs
A
toddler waves the Egyptian flag in January 2012 as protesters celebrate the
one-year anniversary of the revolution. A year and a half later President Morsi
would be removed from power by the military. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty
Images
Rania
Al Malky
When
the Egyptian government announced last month that it had dissolved
57 NGOs, all accused of having links to the banned Muslim Brotherhood, it
was just the latest step in a process which, under the guise of anti-terrorist
policy, is tearing apart the carefully woven fabric of Egyptian society.
The
war on civil society has come in two forms, with the main target being the
Muslim Brotherhood. Back in 2012, after the elation of the 2011 revolution, the
MB candidate Mohamed
Morsi became Egypt’s first ever democratically elected president. But after
the army removed him from power in July 2013, the new government moved swiftly
to clamp down on both the Muslim Brotherhood and its civil society activities.
An
extra-judicial announcement by the interim cabinet declaring the Brotherhood “a
terrorist organisation” in December 2013 was followed by a court ruling. These
moves have to date resulted in the seizure of 1,300 MB-affiliated NGOs, whose
assets were frozen, their premises confiscated by the state and management
taken over by the Ministry of Social Solidarity.
By
July 2015, the number of civil society organisations shut down for allegedly
belonging to the MB had reached 434, according to official statements. Some of
those worked with some of the poorest people in Egypt’s poorest provinces. The MB’s
Islamic Medical Association (IMA) for example, served 2 million sick patients
and thousands of who were in need of kidney dialysis, all unable to pay for
medical treatment. Their charitable, self-sustaining network constituted a
parallel welfare system that often surpassed the “free” government educational
and health services in both quality and efficiency – hence the group’s
mobilising capacity.
Muslim
Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie on trial in Cairo, May 18, 2014. Photograph: Al Youm al
Saabi/Reuters
But
in early 2015 the
IMA was taken over, its board of directors replaced by pro-regime figures
from the health ministry and a new chairman appointed: former Grand Mufti of
Egypt Ali Gomaa – notorious for his anti-Brotherhood rhetoric.
The
Muslim Brotherhood has not been the only victim of the regime’s crackdown on
NGOs. Over the years, the Egyptian government has capriciously targeted other
NGOs with a slew of laws effectively criminalising their activities. It has
particularly singled out organisations calling for social reform, political
liberalisation, and respect for human rights and workers’ rights.
According
to the International
Center for Not-for-Profit Law, while Egypt’s NGO law is one of the most
restrictive in the world, the “effect of the restrictive legal framework … has
not been to ban civil society outright but rather to give enormous
discretionary powers to the Ministry of Social Solidarity”. All civil society
must register with the government, while – as in other countries –
counter-terrorism legislation is also invoked against “any association,
organisation, group or gang” that attempts to “destabilise the public order or
… endanger social unity.”
As
a result, organisations and individuals crossing certain red lines are
“increasingly forced to operate in a climate of fear, limitation, and
uncertainty”, and intimidated by ad hoc security probes.
Mohamed
Zaree, a lawyer and researcher at the Cairo
Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS) tells me that the law
practically equates what they do at the institute – raising awareness of civic
rights or calling for group action in the form of peaceful protest or strikes –
to what Islamic State is doing on the border. “We too can be accused of
‘endangering social unity’ or ‘threatening national peace’,” he says.
The
real objective of these laws and the related character assassination media
campaigns targeting civil society activists, he explains, is to close the public
space and restrict it to official government activity or pro-regime voices.
“Basically, they are created to terrorise people like us, to terrorise press
freedom advocates, workers’ unions and even political parties. They will have
no effect on someone who has no problem blowing himself up,” he says.
Refusing
to register in response to the government’s recent ultimatum, Zaree’s Cairo
Institute is now under investigation sharing the fate of other organisations
like the Hisham Mubarak Law
Center for receiving
foreign funds.
“The
regime has no issue with foreign funding, they have an issue with what we are
doing,” he says.
The
Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights
(EIPR), one of the most respected and influential human rights organisations in
Egypt,
has taken a different tack, deciding to register to cut the red herring of
their legal status out of the debate, which has initiated a long-winded
cat-and-mouse process. In the meantime they have had to downsize from 80 staff
members to 40 and limit the foreign funds they are receiving.
“The
model we built [relying on foreign funding] was unsustainable,” says Gasser
Abdel Razek, executive director of EIPR. “We had a golden opportunity to capitalise
on millions who called for human dignity in 2011 … we have a huge following and
this is what we need to build on.” He is now seriously examining the option of
crowd-funding through membership contributions.
Protest
by supporters of ousted president Mohammed Morsi, 06 Oct 2015. Photograph:
APAImages/Rex Shutterstock
The
registration deadline not only sent shockwaves across civil society circles,
but also forced donors to hold off on supporting organisations which have
hitherto survived under the radar, circumventing government oversight by
registering as not-for-profit companies.
A
development worker employed at a foreign state’s donor agency tells me that
even donors with no controversial political agenda in the region have made no
disbursements directly to human rights programs in the past year.
Funds
have been given to support UN or EU projects in the safe areas of women’s
rights and FGM eradication, but anything beyond that has become risky, the
development worker says. “It’s dangerous for them to receive money.”
They still finger-print
Saturday, October 17, 2015
EGYPT: Is journalism now a crime in Egypt?
New
anti-terrorism law takes Egypt
into Orwellian territory
Published
on Monday 17 August 2015.
Reporters
Without Borders condemns a ban on media reports that conflict with official
accounts of armed attacks and operations by Jihadi militants. The ban is part
of an anti-terrorism law that President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi ratified yesterday
in the absence of an elected parliament.
“Is
journalism is now a crime?” Reporters Without Borders secretary-general
Christophe Deloire asked. “In Egypt
clearly yes, because the Sisi regime is using this new ‘anti-terrorism law’ to
ban journalists from contradicting its own version of events."
“Egyptians
are entering an Orwellian world in which only the government is allowed to say
what is happening. Even in countries where freedom of information is highly
restricted, laws rarely suppress pluralism so blatantly. Egypt is
sinking ever deeper into a terrible despotism that not only wants to control
information and detain journalists but also put them under even more pressure
than during the Mubarak era.”
Published
in the government gazette, the new law provides for fines of 200,000 to 500,000
Egyptian pounds (23,000 to 57,000 euros) for anyone disseminating “false”
information about bombings or other operations by armed groups. A journalist
who, for example, gave a bombing death toll at variance with the government’s,
could be convicted of a criminal offence.
Ever
since Field Marshall Sisi seized power, the authorities have been using the
fight against terrorism as grounds for systematically persecuting journalists
who do not toe the official line.
With
at least 15 journalists currently detained just for doing their job, Egypt is ranked
158th out of 180
countries in the 2015 Reporters Without Borders press freedom index.
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
EGYPT: Isn't El-Sisi Al-Hakim Be Amrel-Lah Al-Fatimi?
One of history's most controversial characters is Al Hakim Bi Amr Allah. Seen as God incarnate by some, as an eccentric "mad" ruler by others, and vilianised by yet others.
Al
Hakim was a Caliph of the Fatimid dynasty of Egypt,
North Africa, Palestine and Syria. Contrary
to the majority of their subjects, who were Sunni, the Fatimids were Shia of
the Ismaili
branch. They engaged in missionary work to spread their sect's belief as wide
as possible.
Al
Hakim reigned from 996 C.E. to 1021 C.E, having acceded to the throne at the
young age of 11, he lived to be only 36 and ruled for 25.
Some
pro-Fatimid sources are too lenient on him, and do not elaborate on his
character and eccentricities, such as Wikipedia's entry, or the Institute of Ismaili Studies in the UK, or the quasi
official Ismaili.Net web site. On
the contrary, most Sunni sources take a very hostile attitude to him, saying
that he claimed divinity for himself.
Al-Hakim's
Eccentric, Erratic and lunatic behavior
Al
Maqrizi sums him up as: "he did not stick to one thing. If he inclines to
something, he would show it and then force people on it. Then he would abandon
it, and then force people to abandon it to whatever he is now inclined to".
Al-Hakim
repeatedly exhibited erratic, eccentric and contradictory behavior. He seemed
to have been keen on the morality of his subjects, repeatedly issuing orders
for this to be done or that not to be done. This goes as far as micromanaging
what is eaten and what is not. Moreover,
he would forbid something then later allow it. He would repeatedly enforce
trivial orders he issued.
Different orders and prohibitions, but the same pile of shit; steamy and stinky
- Orders not to knead dough with legs, and prevented eating of some foods, and the slaughter of cows that have no progeny except in feast days, or those that are not good for plowing fields.
- Ordered that people should not eat Molokheya, the national dish of Egypt, since is was liked by Mu'awya, nor water cress since it was liked by Aisha the prophet's wife.
- Ordered that fisherman should not go for fish that has no scales, nor that any such fish be sold or consumed. Note that this is similar to Jewish law, and the Hanafi school in Sunni Islam. In Egypt this would forbid the Nile Catfish which is commonly consumed in Egypt.
- Ordered that weights and measures be calibrated and no one to cheat others on those. Forbade the manufacture and sale of a certain drink because Ali forbade it.
- Ordered that wine and bananas be forbidden as well as other drinks, scaleless fish, stinky lupins.
- Ordered that all honey be destroyed.
- Ordered certain times for the Azan (Call to prayers) for the mid day and afternoon prayers.
- Order that at the celebration of the Nile's annual flooding there will be no singing, and no drinking in the boats, and arrested some people.
- Ordered that no one is to go outside on the streets before dawn or after the last evening prayers, and punished those who did.
- Ordered that no one should go out of their house after sunset.
- Ordereddogs to be killed and discarded them in the desert. Ordered the streets to be sweeped and cleaned.
- Bells rang in the streets and ordered that no one should go into bathhouses unless wearing something to cover his mid body, and no woman is to show her face on the street, nor attend funerals nor wear revealing or onrate clothes.
- Here is a case where he ordered house arrest for two ex-officials, who were in-laws to each other. Then after a few months. I guess these are the lucky ones, since there were not beheaded and burned like others, including Ibn al-Noman's cousin, and predecessor as Chief Judge.
- Arrested fishmongers who sold fish without scales, as well as bath house rules violators and those who drink a certain drink.
- Arrested and punished thirteen men who prayed a pre-noon prayer.
- Enforced rules about Molokheya and Fish.
- Forbade selling raisins, first more than 5 pounds, then even small amounts, and it was thrown in the Nile. Perhaps it was used in wine making, as below.
- Forbade selling honey in amounts exceeding 3 pounds, perhaps lest it is made into mead.
- prevented women from going outside, going as far as closing the bathhouses for women, not differentiating between young and elderly, and preventing the shoe makers from making any footwear for women, causing some to go bankrupt. To the extent that some elderly women and female servants were arrested. Ordered that people should cover their body in bathhouses and that Christians and Jews have to wear different dress, and punished those who didn't do so. Again punished those who violated bathhouse rules. Enforced the bath house rules and had some violators beaten. Prevented women from erecting makeshift shades in graveyards when they visited.
- Prevented onlookers from going to the slave market unless they are selling or buying, and separated males from females and made them on alternate days.
- Punishing officials then forgiving them.
- Since Al-Hakim was feared by officials and subjects alike, he used to punish some officials, then after a while he would forgive them. They were both executed later.
- Chess sets were collected from various places and burned. Then this was enforced more by corporeal punishment of violators of the decree.
- Instated Khums/Fitra/Najwa tax alms, then Removed them.
- Instated several Shia related taxes, called Khums (= One Fifth), Fitra and Najwa. Then, he revoked them!
- Removed Excise/Customs then Reinstated them.
- Allowed Petitions, then Punished Petitioners. Usually, when a ruler is riding through the city, people will present him with written petitions. Either for injustice that needs redress, or asking for money. He would sometimes respond to the petitions by granting them. Later, he would order petitioners to be imprisoned! Then again, he would accept the petitions, then again he would refuse them and refer them to his cousin (and heir apparent) and the chief judge.
If this isn't lunacy, then what is??!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















